U.S. highways, roads, and streets received a little over $65 billion worth of subsidies in 2022, according to data recently released by the Federal Highway Administration. Apportioning these subsidies to passengers and freight, they work out to about 1.0¢ per passenger-mile and 0.7¢ per ton-mile. For comparison, subsidies to transit averaged $2.39 per passenger-mile while subsidies to Amtrak averaged about 40¢ per passenger-mile.
The Key Bridge in Baltimore collapsed yesterday due to being struck by a ship. If this had happened before 2021, it is likely that some lobby groups would have blamed the collapse on poor maintenance. Such claims led Congress to give the Federal Highway Administration an additional $90 billion, to be spent over six years, in the 2021 infrastructure law.
I calculated the highway subsidy numbers from the Federal Highway Administration’s latest edition of Highway Statistics. The agency once published this report as a book but now issues it as a series of spreadsheets. Earlier this month, I reported on spreadsheets showing the volume of traffic carried on the highways, but the financial spreadsheets were not yet available. Now they are.
Total highway subsidies can be calculated by adding up all of the non-user-fees given to road agencies by federal, state, and local governments, and subtracting from that total the tolls and other highway user fees that are diverted to transit and other non-highway purposes. These numbers are found in table HF-10.
For 2022, table HF-10 says that federal general funds for highways were $90 billion, a substantial increase over the $10 billion in 2021. This is misleading, however, as that $90 billion is meant to be spent over a six-year period. I counted only $15 billion of that amount, and even that may be a bit too high as state agencies were probably not geared up to increase their spending by $5 billion between 2021 and 2022. For the next five years, I’ll add $15 billion to federal spending when using table HF-10 to calculate subsidies.
Table VM-1 says that U.S. highways carried 4.7 trillion passenger-miles in 2022. I don’t count the passenger-miles that the table attributes to heavy trucks, as these represent the drivers, and I wouldn’t count bus or train drivers as passenger-miles carried by transit or Amtrak.
This 4.7 trillion passenger-miles is a sharp drop from the 5.0 trillion reported in 2021 due to a recalculation of automobile occupancy rates. The 2017 National Household Travel Survey estimated the average auto carried 1.67 people but the 2022 survey found this had dropped to 1.52 people. It is likely that this drop was due to the pandemic, which means the lower number should have been applied in 2021, but the Federal Highway Administration continued to use the 2017 number.
To apportion the $65 billion in subsidies to passengers and freight, I add up the total amount spent on automobiles and the total amount spent on highway shipping. Unfortunately, the Bureau of Transportation Statistics has not yet reported ton-miles of freight for 2022, but in previous years, shipping accounted for about 25 percent of expenditures while passenger travel accounted for 75 percent. Three-quarters of the $65 billion divided by 4.7 trillion passenger-miles works out to 1.0 cents per passenger-mile. Assuming 2022 ton-miles were not drastically different from 2020, subsidies to trucks averaged about 0.67 cents per ton-mile.
We don’t yet have enough data to calculate subsidies to air travel, which in previous years averaged about 1¢ per passenger-mile. Based on available data, I estimate this increased to a little over 3¢ per passenger-mile in 2022 due to increased spending on airports and somewhat lower passenger-miles. It is still well below the 40 cents per passenger-mile Amtrak subsidies.
While highway subsidies averaged a penny per passenger-mile nationwide, subsidies can vary greatly by state. Using the same formula as at the federal level, state and local highway subsidies can be calculated by subtracting the diversions of highway user fees to transit and other non-highway purposes from the non-user fees spent on roads. Tables SDF and LDF report state and local diversions of user fees to other purposes while tables SF-3 and LF-1 report state and local non-user-fees spent on roads.
In an Antiplanner policy brief, I estimated the state subsidies and the local subsidies per vehicle-mile for each state. To do so, I had to estimate how much travel was done on state highways and how much on local roads. For today, I’ll just estimate the total of state and local subsidies by state.
Highway Statistics doesn’t show how much traffic in each state is trucks vs. autos. Auto occupancy rates also vary by state — they will be higher in states with larger family sizes — but those data aren’t available either. The subsidies per passenger-mile assume 1.52 occupants per vehicle and that 25 percent of total subsidies are attributable to freight. The numbers shown only include subsidies from state & local governments; federal subsidies, which averaged about 0.2 cents per passenger-mile, are not included.
State | Subsidies | VMT | Subsidy ¢/VMT | Subsidy ¢/PM |
---|---|---|---|---|
Alabama | 85 | 71,631 | 0.12 | 0.06 |
Alaska | 383 | 5,478 | 7.00 | 3.45 |
Arizona | 1,156 | 76,159 | 1.52 | 0.75 |
Arkansas | 664 | 38,530 | 1.72 | 0.85 |
California | -1,268 | 315,244 | -0.40 | -0.20 |
Colorado | 582 | 53,935 | 1.08 | 0.53 |
Connecticut | 203 | 29,666 | 0.68 | 0.34 |
Delaware | 26 | 9,872 | 0.26 | 0.13 |
Dist. of Col. | -89 | 3,421 | -2.61 | -1.29 |
Florida | 406 | 227,757 | 0.18 | 0.09 |
Georgia | 1,132 | 128,871 | 0.88 | 0.43 |
Hawaii | 54 | 10,289 | 0.52 | 0.26 |
Idaho | 353 | 19,157 | 1.84 | 0.91 |
Illinois | 1,324 | 103,752 | 1.28 | 0.63 |
Indiana | 636 | 95,684 | 0.67 | 0.33 |
Iowa | 375 | 32,712 | 1.15 | 0.57 |
Kansas | 1,130 | 31,334 | 3.61 | 1.78 |
Kentucky | -125 | 48,047 | -0.26 | -0.13 |
Louisiana | 348 | 56,514 | 0.61 | 0.30 |
Maine | 37 | 14,651 | 0.25 | 0.13 |
Maryland | -787 | 56,746 | -1.39 | -0.68 |
Massachusetts | 376 | 56,949 | 0.66 | 0.33 |
Michigan | 840 | 95,901 | 0.88 | 0.43 |
Minnesota | 1,581 | 57,471 | 2.75 | 1.36 |
Mississippi | 218 | 39,952 | 0.55 | 0.27 |
Missouri | 1,174 | 79,431 | 1.48 | 0.73 |
Montana | 21 | 13,514 | 0.15 | 0.08 |
Nebraska | 547 | 21,270 | 2.57 | 1.27 |
Nevada | 535 | 27,647 | 1.93 | 0.95 |
New Hampshire | 96 | 13,281 | 0.72 | 0.36 |
New Jersey | 1,584 | 75,288 | 2.10 | 1.04 |
New Mexico | 14 | 26,831 | 0.05 | 0.03 |
New York | 450 | 115,382 | 0.39 | 0.19 |
North Carolina | 633 | 119,381 | 0.53 | 0.26 |
North Dakota | 101 | 9,180 | 1.10 | 0.54 |
Ohio | 1,676 | 110,578 | 1.52 | 0.75 |
Oklahoma | 916 | 44,566 | 2.05 | 1.01 |
Oregon | -32 | 36,576 | -0.09 | -0.04 |
Pennsylvania | 124 | 99,912 | 0.12 | 0.06 |
Rhode Island | -60 | 7,531 | -0.80 | -0.39 |
South Carolina | 832 | 58,988 | 1.41 | 0.70 |
South Dakota | 163 | 10,170 | 1.61 | 0.79 |
Tennessee | -292 | 83,219 | -0.35 | -0.17 |
Texas | -907 | 290,890 | -0.31 | -0.15 |
Utah | 811 | 34,336 | 2.36 | 1.17 |
Vermont | 78 | 7,128 | 1.09 | 0.54 |
Virginia | 1,846 | 82,083 | 2.25 | 1.11 |
Washington | 245 | 58,483 | 0.42 | 0.21 |
West Virginia | 115 | 15,312 | 0.75 | 0.37 |
Wisconsin | 487 | 66,167 | 0.74 | 0.36 |
Wyoming | 498 | 9,324 | 5.34 | 2.63 |
Total | 21,426 | 3,196,191 | 0.67 | 0.33 |
Subsidies and vehicle-miles traveled are in millions; subsidies per vehicle-mile and per passenger-mile are in pennies. You can show all states and the District of Columbia by choosing “100” in “Show — entries.”
California and ten other states divert so much out of gas taxes and other highway user fees to non-highway uses that subsidies in those states are negative. Subsidies tend to be greatest in states like Alaska and Wyoming that have lots of roads but not many people to drive on them. An average of 94 percent of the state and local subsidies are from local governments because most local governments have limited abilities to charge tolls, fuel taxes, or other user fees.
What happened at the Francis Key bridge, sad I know 10 people who use it daily. More prevalent issue is rent some tugboats and tug that debris out of the water so ships can continue.
People need get their heads around “SUbsidies”
In 2018 before Pandemic Transit carried 0.9% of US modal split but received 54 Billion dollars on top the 16 billion in revenue pulled by actual fares Transit was 3x more expensive than what it pulled in. By 2022 Transit carried barely more Half or 0.75% of Passenger miles.
Total road spending in USA, was 280 Billion dollars, Roads, streets, highways, avenues, boulevards…
But carried nearly 5 TRILLION passenger miles and 240 million vehicles, trucks, motorcycles.
What happened at Key bridge, was accident, the SHIP had power failure and according to logs/reports did everything short of time travel or self destruct like ALIEN.
The point of the matter is a bridge that spans over major US access point for maritime trade didn’t have any caisson protection to stop ship impacts.
Another reason is that type construction. The Francis Scott Key bridge is a erector span truss bridge, an Obsolete and largely vulnerable design. But because it’s basically welded and nuts and bolts it’s easy to repair.
The bridge was also a toll bridge hence with 30,000 drivers paying average 3-4 bucks, 30-40 million in revenue, enough for it’s upkeep
It’s without question California High speed rail; will require 600! Bridges, tunnels and overpass sections. What exactly is their plan to Pay for this infrastructure; I’m not talking about building it, but longterm plan to maintain it after it’s built; when/IF the trains are running on mesely ridership they anticipate.
The Port of Baltimore generates about 15,300 direct jobs, with nearly 140,000 jobs overall linked to Port activities.
Yep and had a bridge over the harbor without protection from ship impacts for a bridge that’s been in service since 1977… Politicians and big Capitalism
Penny Wise
Dollar stupid.
Arterials/Collector routes?
If and when there is a transition from petroleum to electricity to power our cars and trucks and busses, the government will have to figure out how to replace the gasoline and diesel fuel tax revenue,
Copilot tell us; Additional Registration Fees, Tolls, Taxing EV Charging Stations and Vehicle Tax Miles.
I-Pass for all?
EV aren’t replacing gas anytime soon. I did the math several times a while ago. Converting transportation to electric power would require 20 nuclear reactors worth daily generation per decade and a 3x grid construction.
Electric cars are simply lesser of two evils. Thou they require huge new technological mineral demands, electricity as fuel poses no threat to agricultural soils. Can be produced thru various means. The point is, electric cars storage medium is 80x less dense than fossil fuels, meaning 80x material demand per unit of energy storage is needed.
this isnt even mentioning the weight of electric battery vehicles, which cause a massive toll on the roads in comparison to gas powered vehicles. Theres a reason why electric semi’s arent a thing, because they’re so heavy that they’d dig up the ground beneath them if they had a full load. Then theres also the issue of them being prone to catch on fire and ruin the road beneath them and burn so hot that they cant even get put out with a whole firetruck
Passenger cars and light trucks, even if they are heavier than normal, don’t cause significant pavement damage so that isn’t really a concern. Semi’s must meet maximum weight standards so they won’t cause additional pavement damage either. However, they will have a smaller payload because of the weight of the batteries. Don’t get me wrong. I don’t think electric vehicles are going to take over any time soon for a number of reasons, but we need to make sure all of our arguments are factual.
yeah I meant the semis would pretty much dig up the road under them if they had a full payload (how much they’d carry if on gasoline). the normal passenger cars however do cause more wear and tear, equivalent to whole trucks when sedan sized.
sir, would it be possible for you to post your 4 mode subsidy vs cost graph for this year? i find it stops a lot of people on the twitter in their tracks, then for detail i can lead them here.