You can download the Antiplanner’s presentation at the Montana Property Rights conference in PDF or PowerPoint formats. Both photo-heavy files are about 15 MB and include notes indicating the gist of my narrative.
Those who are interested can also download the Antiplanner’s recent Wichita presentation in PDF or PowerPoint formats. The Wichita presentations, which are about 25 MB, deal with downtown revitalization, while the Montana presentations deal with the effects of smart-growth planning on property rights.
The bought this levitra uk most frequent cases that happen after the diagnosis are polycystic ovaries. For use as needed: Take it canadian pharmacy levitra at least 30 minutes every day. Make sure that as and when you find yourself facing this issue even once then without any delay make sure you visit the doctor and take a proper generic cialis online treatment to get through the issue. It should be taken approximately 45 minutes check availability cialis generic tabs ago before the genital communication.
I also have posted last November’s presentation in Boise, which concerned streetcars, in PDF and PowerPoint formats. These are about 10 MB and, as with the Wichita and Montana files, include the core of my narrative in notes.
the Montana presentations deal with the effects of smart-growth planning on property rights.
How odd. I expected to see some slides talking about increasing property values, lowering foreclosure risk, some such.
As well as expecting some slides discussing the differences among states, and a slide or two talking about the farmland saved (protecting farmers’ property rights to continue to farm).
No slide about the SG states having a lower rate of congestion increase (altho, admittedly, not a PPR issue).
Did these slides with these facts get deleted from the .ppt upon uploading?
Or did I miss these facts due to the illegibility and unwatchability of the presentation (I did catch the quote-mining of the G&G however…)?
DS
Farmers have a right to continue to farm? Since when?
That’s not what I wrote.
DS
“protecting farmers’ property rights to continue to farm” -DS
Ooops! Sorry.
If you don’t know the difference, you can’t speak to the issue or assess why Private Property Rights movements fail.
DS
Dan,
Any data for “SG states having a lower rate of congestion increase.”?
Do you think that farmers & their land should be controlled by the state?
Well, it seems like you think that the should control much of peoples’ property, wealth & behavior.
Your vagueness leads to no substance.
When somebody presses you to an issue, you change your stance, ignore or change the subject.
Farmland saved? That’s really not issue. Although many people make it out to be.
There is plenty of farmland. Since about 1950, 500,000 sq.mi. less of land is use for agriculture. Little of that is due to urbanization.
For reference, 80% of the US lives on about 75,000 sq.mi. (2.5% urbanized land).
The issue of farmland is often that the owner cannot sell it for homes to be built on. Oh no, open space might drop to 97% of the contiguous states.