Keep Your Bureaucrats Out of My Sense of Community

One of the things that make the Antiplanner see red is whenever anyone talks about the need for government to help create a “sense of community.” John Gardner, of Common Cause, thinks of government “as a critical partner in” restoring a sense of community, and particularly would like to see more federal involvement.

As noted here last week, David Brooks thinks the infrastructure stimulus bill can build a sense of community by helping to “create suburban town squares.” Architect/planners like Andres Duany think their designs create a sense of community for the people who live in them.

Sense of community is hard to measure, which makes it ideal for urban planners who love to muck things up without being responsible for the results. Precisely because it is so difficult to measure, government should stay out of any efforts to create it.

The first important point to understand about community is that it is not now and probably never has been geographically based. Back in the 1950s, Herbert Gans spent a year living in Boston’s West End, a dense, mixed-use neighborhood that Jane Jacobs would predict had a high sense of community, and another year living in Levittown, New Jersey, a suburban neighborhood that Jacobs might predict would have a low sense of community. In fact, Gans found the same sense of community in both places, but specifically noted that people in Boston’s West End identified with their ethnic or religious groups more than with their physical neighborhood.

You do not want to endanger viagra viagra online your health, hence the need to stop using it. The fascinating trivia encompassing Kamagra is it was at first prepared to enhance circulatory system purchase viagra http://www.slovak-republic.org/visa-embassies/comment-page-1/ stream into the heart and mitigate cardiovascular issues. He might likewise recommend some better different options for unsafe solutions and now and then alluding you to clinical clinician or relationship advisor. viagra wholesale price These are the reason buy female viagra for the medicine to their patients. Nor does sense of community have anything to do with town centers. We view town centers as places to shop, but if they don’t have the goods to satisfy our needs or desires, we will go somewhere else without a pang of guilt that we might feel if we actually felt any sense of community with those centers. There is also no evidence that any particular architectural design, such as pedestrian-friendly streets, improves a sense of community, though it may be attractive for a time as a novel type of shopping experience.

Instead of being geographically or architecturally based, we form a sense of community with those who share some of our likes and dislikes. Having moved into a new neighborhood about a year ago, the Antiplanner has discovered a strong sense of community here, but it is among people who own dogs. Most of the people who do not own dogs do not participate in the community activities shared by those who do own dogs — presumably, the non-dog-owners have their own little communities.

The sense of community that comes from shared interests extends well beyond any political boundaries such as city, state, or even nation. The lump in my throat that I feel when I watch the Where the Hell is Matt? video must be due to some sense of community, but this sense has absolutely no geographic boundaries.

While it is fine to enjoy your sense of community if you have one, it isn’t clear to me that it is an essential part of daily life. It is clear that, in order to be able to function in society, people need to empathize with others — those who cannot end up being cruel and inhumane. But it is not clear that a sense of community is a necessary part of that empathy.

In fact, emphasizing community carries with it a real danger that people will end up placing community over individuals. This attitude has led to some of the worst evils in history. This makes me all the more interested in keeping government out of any sense of community we may have.

Thanks to the automobile, airplane, telephone, and Internet, we can share our sense of community with people all over the world. If we can’t take the initiative ourselves, people like Matt Harding can do it for us. We don’t need government to give us a sense of community, and we are better off if it doesn’t try.

Bookmark the permalink.

About The Antiplanner

The Antiplanner is a forester and economist with more than fifty years of experience critiquing government land-use and transportation plans.

57 Responses to Keep Your Bureaucrats Out of My Sense of Community

  1. Dan says:

    Owen (49) this is exactly my GI work and I’ve been traveling the country talking about it, and have manuscripts out detailing how to do it.

    There is no contradiction.

    Owen (50):

    You haven’t read the paper, don’t understand it, or choose not to understand it. Glaeser’s comments starting on pg 31 refute your assertion.
    HTH.

    DS

  2. Owen McShane says:

    I have read the paper and do understand it but I simply reach different conclusions from you.
    That is the way of the world and I do not presume that you have not read it or do not understand it.
    Here is a paragraph from the body of the paper:
    26
    V. Economics and Urban Policy
    The economic approach to urban policy combines the use of cost-benefit analysis and the
    assumption that the goal of policy is to increase the choices available to people. The
    most important part of this assumption is that people, not places, are the important
    outcomes. A policy that yields a beautiful place, but does little to increase the welfare of
    individuals has little appeal to most economists. Policies make sense to economists if
    their benefits to people outweigh their costs. This may not distinguish economists from
    sociologists, but it does distinguish economists from some architecturally oriented urban
    planners and from place-based politicians.

    He concedes that some place based policies do benefit people – and uses the example of improving the drinking water. These are not what most new urbanists have in mind.

    It seems to me that Glaeser reaches a nicely balanced conclusion. President Johnson once said he longed for a one armed economist because all his advisers argued “on the one hand …. but on the other hand …. ” Glaeser has two arms but lets us know which arms deserves more weight.

  3. Dan says:

    I suggest you know FA about what New Urbanists have in mind – they seek to build places for people. Claiming that NUs seek to build places not for people is ignorant at best.

    DS

  4. Owen McShane says:

    Once you revert to abuse you have lost the argument.

  5. Dan says:

    No. You have nothing to back your claim, so now you claim abuse.

    DS

  6. Scott says:

    Dan, you always lose by default or avoiding confrontation on the issue. Owen won. Highwayman, same applies to you.

  7. the highwayman says:

    Yes Scott, you’re a big time weiner!

Leave a Reply