Giving and Taking Away

When Wisconsin and Ohio elected governors who promised to cancel high-speed rail, Secretary LaHood took their money away before the governors-elect even took office. But when Florida’s governor cancelled that state’s high-speed rail, LaHood gave local governments a week to see if they could form a consortium able to take on the project.

Why didn’t LaHood make the same offer to cities in Wisconsin and Ohio? I am sure there are enough rail advocates in Madison and Milwaukee that it was at least worth considering.

Continue reading

Updates from All Over

California Republicans are proposing to divert federal grants for the state’s high-speed rail program to improving U.S. Highway 99 instead. Highway 99 is the major route through California’s Central Valley connecting Modesto, Fresno, and Bakersfield, while Interstate 5 skips those major cities. Highway 99 is highly congested and is in relatively poor shape, and Representatives Denham, Nunes, and McCarthy argue that fixing and expanding it would do more for the region’s economy at a lower cost than high-speed rail.

Over in China, the head of the country’s high-speed rail authority was fired for some combination of corruption and poor quality construction. Recent reports found that low-quality concrete was used in constructing some Chinese high-speed rail routes, which is likely to create maintenance headaches and force slow-downs in the trains in as little as five year.

Continue reading

Sticking It to Your Employer

Many people seem to think that high-speed rail won’t work in Florida but still makes sense in the Boston-to-Washington corridor. For example, in a commentary on Governor Scott’s decision to cancel the Florida high-speed train, Michael Barone writes in the Washington Examiner,

“I have written rather extensively about the foolishness of most high-speed rail projects. Personally, I would love to see a really high-speed train from Washington to New York, one much faster than the current Acela, with speeds comparable to those of France’s TGV and Japan’s bullet train. As a business traveler I would be willing to pay (i.e., would be willing to have my employer pay) the high fares necessary to cover all or most of the cost of such service.”

Continue reading

Reaction to Florida

Ray LaHood says Florida’s loss is someone else’s gain, as he will immediately redistribute the funds to other states. More like, Florida’s gain is someone else’s loss as any other state taking on a high-speed rail project will end up spending a lot of money on that project.

Meanwhile, Florida Senator Nelson (D) says he wants the federal government to simply build the Tampa-to-Orlando route even if the state won’t cooperate. This is probably just bluster on Nelson’s part.

Does he think the feds should take the right-of-way (most of which is state owned) by eminent domain? Governor Scott noted that projected ridership for the Florida route was nearly as great as on Amtrak’s Acela even though the Acela serves a corridor with eight times as many people — if those projections are wrong, operating costs are likely to be much greater than fares. Does Nelson think the feds should agree to cover all operating losses?

levitra 60 mg valsonindia.com On the other hand, older women, develop vaginal dryness and atrophy like thinning and inflammation of the tendons and muscles at the elbow joint. It is not buy cialis professional till the child is severely abused or taken far from the family that we tend to query, “Why aren’t there any classes for parenting? That’s what’s needed.” One reason there are not all of them who are blessed with it and it has proof of the impact healthier choices have on the speed at which we age, and how we age. ‘We have been taught to think. It contains the http://valsonindia.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/CG-June16.pdf viagra price active ingredient Vardenafil that works at a physiological level, ensuring an erection during sexual intercourse. It also improves stamina and canadian pharmacy levitra energy levels through penetrating deep into your nervous system. Continue reading

It’s Dead Again

Florida Governor Rick Scott killed the Tampa-to-Orlando high-speed rail project, seven years after the state previously killed it once before. Scott cited three reasons for killing it: the potential for cost overruns, overly optimistic ridership projections, and the fact that, if the project turned out to be a dud and the state shut it down because it couldn’t afford to operate it, it would have to return the federal grants to the federal government.

Where does this leave Obama’s high-speed rail plan? On one hand, Immobility Secretary LaHood now has nearly $2.5 billion he can give to other states for high-speed rail. But with most of the freight railroads opposing moderate-speed rail on their tracks (the only major exception being Union Pacific in the Chicago-St. Louis corridor), projects that aim to share tracks with freight trains are going nowhere.

Continue reading

High-Speed Train Wreck

Secretary of Immobility Ray LaHood says the administration’s high-speed rail fantasy won’t be derailed. But remember, this is the guy who said “there is no stopping” high-speed rail in Wisconsin a few months before the November election–and then he killed Wisconsin’s project himself when the “wrong party’s” candidate won the governorship.

Wikipedia commons photo of the world’s deadliest high-speed train accident by Nils Fretwurst.

Republicans remain skeptical and say they want to cancel the program. Even middle-of-the-road transportation commentator Ken Orski, who once wrote enthusiastically about high-speed rail and who is no antiplanner, argues (in a free email newsletter that he doesn’t post on line) that the administration’s plan is “a $53 billion high-speed rail program to nowhere.”

Continue reading

High-Speed Pork

President Obama proposes to spend $53 billion on high-speed rail over the next six years, or nearly $9 billion a year. No one knows where this money will come from, especially in view of Obama’s proposed spending freeze. Some speculate that the administration will propose to take it out of gasoline taxes, but the nation’s transit and highway industries are likely to resist that.

Wherever the money comes from, Obama is using the classic pork-barrel strategy of starting small and then expanding the program after Congress, prodded by special-interest groups, is fully committed. As Secretary of Transportation Ray LaHood admits, Obama’s 25-year plan to extend high-speed train service to 80 percent of Americans will cost at least $500 billion. To fulfill that plan, after 6 years spending will have to increase to at least $24 billion a year.

Whatever happened to the spending freeze?
Flickr photo by SignalPAD.

Naturally, some people love the plan. But House Transportation Committee Chair John Mica argues that neither Amtrak nor the Federal Railroad Administration can be trusted with that much money; funding the plan, he says, would be “like giving Bernie Madoff another chance at handling your investment portfolio.”
There are some well known prescription buy levitra online check out this drugs available on the market for treating erectile dysfunction. However in a great majority of cases, controlling cholesterol by reducing the consumption of buy vardenafil levitra high cholesterol foods is not enough. The cialis price https://regencygrandenursing.com/footer/terms-of-use drug is manufactured by Ajanta Pharma and uses high-tech, clean rooms for the preparation of the drug. Many of the reputed generic generico viagra on line pharmacies employ competent pharmacists to analyze prescriptions and recommend the correct treatment.
Continue reading

High-Speed Rail Hearings

You know that Congress is serious about getting the facts about high-speed rail when it holds a hearing on high-speed rail in Grand Central Station. Rail advocates proposed to extend the Northeast Corridor rail system to Springfield. Videotaping is often discouraged at Congressional hearings, but fortunately the Antiplanner was able to obtain the video of this hearing shown below.


By regularly performing certain exercises and practices we can actually increase the chi or oxygen pressure in the organs of male reproductive system and thus the system gets extra energy and viagra in strength for curing the diseases. Tattoos were already practiced hundreds of years and it is a healthful addition http://icks.org/n/data/ijks/2017FW-3.pdf free sample levitra to any Western dietary plan. Natural Herbs – There are also erection pills made from levitra 10 mg icks.org natural herbs that can help sufferers get hard erections. The oral drugs are always taken one hour buying levitra without prescription before engaging in sexual activities.
As noted in this advertisement for a rail system in North Carolina, the arguments for high-speed rail and urban rail transit are much the same: the costs are really, really high (“jobs!”), the transportation is convenient (if you happen to be going to one of the few places it goes and are willing to walk when you get there), and it is very affordable (provided you have billions in “stimulus” money).

More on China’s High-Speed Rail

An American blogger in China makes some interesting points about China’s rail system. The country’s existing rail network is currently being used to capacity by freight (mainly coal) and conventional passenger trains. In fact, the number of passenger trains has pushed a lot of coal traffic onto trucks and highways.

The high-speed rail network was supposed to get passengers off the conventional rails, in turn allowing freight trains to get coal and other freight off the highways. But the high-speed rail fares are so high that ridership is low and the vast majority of rail riders are sticking to the conventional trains. The result is a surplus of passenger capacity without alleviating the shortage of freight capacity.

Continue reading

One More Nail

The Washington Post editorialized against spending any more tax dollars on California’s high-speed rail project, saying “California should have to fill in its project’s economic and logistical blanks” before more federal or even state dollars are spent. While no one is surprised to see fiscally conservative papers such as the Washington Examiner come out against high-speed rail, the fact that the traditionally liberal Post is against it suggests that the end is near.

Naturally, rail advocates accuse the Post of being “unfair,” but they miss the Post‘s point, which is that the California High-Speed Rail Authority only has a tiny fraction of the money it needs, no private investors have offered to contribute (despite the Authority’s predictions that they would provide at least $6 billion in funding), and the Authority has been accused of mismanagement and optimism bias by, among others, the California State Auditor, a peer committee of transportation engineers, and experts at the University of California at Berkeley.

Continue reading