Protecting Cities in Fire-Prone Regions

If you live in a fire-prone area, which includes most of California, it is not a good idea to allow ivy and other plants to cover the sides of your building, as this winery and this church did near Santa Rosa. Both were lost to last week’s wildfires.

Similarly, if you are a legislator in a fire-prone state, it is not a good idea to outlaw fire-resistant developments. As now-retired Forest Service researcher Jack Cohen relates in the above video, one requirement for making your home fire-safe is to have no large flammable structures within 100 feet of the home. That pretty much means people should build on one-acre or larger lots.

But in California, the nation’s most fire-prone state, urban planners’ mania for density has led the legislature to effectively outlaw such low-density development. Santa Rosa’s Coffey Park neighborhood consisted of conventionally sized suburban homes on 50-by-100-foot lots–small for a modern suburb–resulting in many houses being only a few feet apart from one another. If one house caught fire during a dry spell, the intense radiant heat would be sure to set off the next home. As a result, the neighborhood is now a smoking ruin.
Dysfunctional emotions, thinking and reactions between family members and the alcoholic or drug addict begin as coping mechanisms to help the family survive as they sildenafil best price start experiencing deep emotional pain, but these soon become self-defeating. The official viagra properien http://new.castillodeprincesas.com/tag/boda-vintage/ website does not offer any guarantees pertaining to the safety of this product. Uprima medicine works by enhancing nerve signals that causes nerve signals to be sent from viagra in uk brain to the male organ. A problem with one part of the body can cause a lot of problems in your relationship. price for levitra
As the Antiplanner noted a decade ago, California developers have built shelter-in-place neighborhoods that are so fire-resistant that it is safer for residents to stay in their homes than to evacuate. Wildfires have swept by these neighborhoods and not harmed a single home.

Sadly, this technique has been criticized by even the California Department of Forestry, which argues that making homes fire-safe will just encourage people to live in fire-prone areas (meaning almost all of California). They suggested that people build their homes closer together to make them “easier to protect.” That didn’t work very well in Santa Rosa.

If California had allowed urban areas to grow in the modern way, with density at the center and increasingly low densities at the edges, then a ring of low-density, shelter-in-place neighborhoods around Santa Rosa and other cities could have provided a fire break protecting the denser developments. But this is practically forbidden in California. So, we will get more disasters like the one in Santa Rosa and the 1991 Oakland Hills firestorm.

Bookmark the permalink.

About The Antiplanner

The Antiplanner is a forester and economist with more than fifty years of experience critiquing government land-use and transportation plans.

5 Responses to Protecting Cities in Fire-Prone Regions

  1. the highwayman says:

    Should all buildings then have fire sprinkler systems?

    Also what if a plane crashes into your home? :$

  2. Frank says:

    “Also what if a plane crashes into your home? :$”

    And what if you shut the f*ck up?

  3. the highwayman says:

    It’s NIMBYism, don’t get a place near an airport and then complain about planes. Don’t get a place out in the brush and then complain about brush fires.

    Frank, why don’t you try find a job and stop complaining about nothing? :$

  4. Frank says:

    Why don’t you shut the füçk up?

  5. the highwayman says:

    Frank, why do you continually complain about nothing? :$

Leave a Reply