A Billion Here, a Billion There . . .

The city of Honolulu has now officially admitted that completing its misbegotten rail transit project will cost more than $10 billion and that it won’t be done until 2033. When first proposed back in 2006, it was supposed to cost less than $3 billion and when construction began in 2013 it was supposed to begin operations early this year.

Although it will be completely elevated, leading the Federal Transit Administration to classify it as heavy rail, the trains Honolulu has purchased will only have the capacity of light rail. It is costing more per urban resident than any rail line in the world, yet it won’t be able to carry as many people per hour as a bus-rapid transit line.

Meanwhile, Denver’s Regional Transit District (RTD), which has suffered its own cost-overruns, is enthused about the idea of spending $2.5 billion for a 45-mph Front Range train from Ft. Collins to Pueblo. RTD’s own FasTracks rail project ended up costing more than twice as much as was promised to voters, forcing RTD to at least delay construction on a proposed line to Longmont.

When that line was at the stage that Front Range rail is at now, RTD estimated that it would cost $211 million. By 2008, the cost had risen to more than $700 million and the line was expected to carry so few riders that taxpayers would end up paying $60 a ride.
Depression sis a psychological disorder accompanied by feelings of sadness, cheap cialis generic loss, anger, or frustration interfering with everyday living. In a research carried out by few scientists at the University of Florida recently, acai fruit generico levitra on line was found to have killed 88% of the cancer cells. A lot of students think that their high grades with little effort from high school will carry over and might not know how they should study for college amerikabulteni.com buy generic viagra classes. amerikabulteni.com generico levitra on line Perplexity may occur on the patient and also the disability to follow orders.
RTD’s decision to push back the Longmont line for a decade or two naturally angered Longmont officials who had endorsed FasTracks because RTD promised them a train. A Front Range train paid for by the state could get RTD off the hook since that train would also go through Longmont.

Longmont-Denver is less than a quarter of the distance from Ft. Collins to Pueblo. If RTD suffered a 230 percent cost overrun (and the real cost is undoubtedly even more now), what makes anyone think that the projected cost of Front Range rail is reliable? Not to mention the fact that, with the pandemic, there’s no guarantee that anyone will want to ride such a train in the future anyway.

This is just another illustration of the problem with government funding of transportation infrastructure. Even if the early projects make sense (which in the case of Denver or Honolulu rail, they didn’t), political pressures will require that more projects be built that don’t make sense. This is why transportation infrastructure should be funded exclusively out of user fees; if users aren’t willing to pay for it, it shouldn’t be built.

Tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

About The Antiplanner

The Antiplanner is a forester and economist with more than fifty years of experience critiquing government land-use and transportation plans.

3 Responses to A Billion Here, a Billion There . . .

  1. Francis King says:

    “The city of Honolulu has now officially admitted that completing its misbegotten rail transit project will cost more than $10 billion and that it won’t be done until 2033”.

    Just in time for the transport museum to open. Instead of taking the vehicles to the rail line they could just take them straight to the museum and cut the freight costs.

    “Although it will be completely elevated…”

    And as ugly as sin. Although the columns are well-spaced, looking along the line of the corridor you end up with a wall of concrete poles. Is Hawaii so ugly that this is an improvement?

    “yet it won’t be able to carry as many people per hour as a bus-rapid transit line.”

    And yet professional engineers keep using rail. Here’s a conundrum. Which is most likely? a) Antiplanner is correct. b) Everyone else is correct.

  2. prk166 says:

    Seems like talk of that Front Range commuter train has been around forever. Given how quick they’re to spend money on studies, I’m suprised they don’t have a couple concrete routes planned out by now.

    More importantly, are BNSF and UP on board with it? I can’t imagine they’re excited about putting more traffic on an already crowded joint-line between Pueblo, Colorado Springs and Denver. But maybe with the drop in Powder River Basin coal loadings, that line’s got plenty of free capacity again? Maybe.

    Either way, no use planning things out more until those 2 are game. There aren’t any other practical options for the denver – pueblo stretch of that.

    CO DOT railroad map for state:
    http://dtdapps.coloradodot.info/staticdata/downloads/StatewideMaps/RailSystem.pdf

  3. metrosucks says:

    “And yet professional engineers keep using rail. Here’s a conundrum. Which is most likely? a) Antiplanner is correct. b) Everyone else is correct.”

    Or c), government planners are lying, corrupt pieces of shit?

Leave a Reply