Los Angeles city and regional planners are just as responsible for the Palisades, Eaton, and other fires that have burned in the past few days as if they had poured gasoline on the homes and lit the matches. The destruction of these homes, including, for what it is worth, homes owned by Jeff Bridges, Billy Crystal, and Paris Hilton, among other celebrities, is a direct result of so-called “smart-growth” policies that call for establishing greenbelts around cities and packing people in high-density housing within those cities.
Pacific Palisades is on the edge of the Santa Monica Mountains, most of which have been locked up from development in various regional parks, including 72,000 acres protected by the Santa Monica Conservancy, 157,700 acres in the Santa Monica National Recreation Area, and various smaller parks. These have severely limited the amount of land available for housing and other developments, driving up housing prices.
Although homes in Pacific Palisades sell for millions of dollars, the lots are small, generally between 5,000 and 7,500 square feet. Many of the larger lots are long and narrow, so the lot widths are often only about 50 feet. This means that homes tend to be built no more than about 20 feet apart and sometimes as little as 10 feet apart.
Source: Google Streetview.
One of the standards for building fire-resistant communities is that homes and other structures should be at least 50 and preferably 100 feet apart from one another, meaning homes should be built on around 1-acre lots. The two multi-million-dollar homes above are not only too close to one another, one of the homeowners has planted a tree and other tall vegetation between them. Unless the home on the right is built entirely of steel and concrete, once the home on the left catches fire, the radiant heat from that fire would be certain to ignite its neighbor. These homes were two lots away from parklands, so it is likely that they have burned to the ground. This is the same situation found in Colorado’s Marshall Fire as well as fires on the edge of Santa Rose and other California cities.
It’s not like this should surprise anyone in Pacific Palisades. The hills of southern California are some of the most fire-prone landscapes in North America. The first modern development in Pacific Palisades was Inceville, a movie studio that opened in 1911, which was mostly burned by a fire in 1916, and finished off by another fire in 1922.
There have been plenty of fires since then. The most recent was a 2018 fire that burned 97,000 acres and more than 1,600 structures, killing three people and forcing the evacuation of nearly 300,000. Despite these experiences, Los Angeles urban planners remain more intent on their dreams of compact development than on fireproofing their city.
We’ve also been treated to videos of bulldozers moving vehicles that were abandoned by their owners stuck in gridlock while attempting to evacuate the area. The videos aren’t absolutely clear where this took place but it appears to be on Palisades Drive, which is one of only two roads out of a neighborhood known as the Summit, the other road being a fire road that may not have even been open to the public. Greater development of the area now preserved by the Santa Monica Mountains Conservancy would have provided more escape routes.
Rebuilding existing homes and installing landscaping to firewise standards will help but won’t completely prevent future losses so long as homes are built close to one another. Forcing existing landowners to merge lots and build at only a fifth of existing densities is probably a non-starter.
The best alternative to prevent future fires similar to the Palisades Fire would be to sell a one-half-mile buffer strip of all park lands adjacent to existing urban development, zone that buffer strip for one-acre homesites, and require that the owners of homes built on those sites build to firewise standards (e.g., non-flammable roofs) and maintain defensible landscaping (e.g., few trees and none next to the houses). Such a buffer strip will protect existing housing from fire while the new homes built will do more to make housing affordable than any number of mid-rise or high-rise projects.
Imma build me a house out of wood.
Hey that’s great, where?
In a place that only gets 14 inches if rainfall a year has chronic water problems and has to import 90% it’s water from 150-750 miles away.
Well fuck….
Rome didn’t have this problem cause they build everything out of fuking stone of impeccable build quality…because even in ruin it’s still intact 2000 years later.