Review of Surface Transportation Commission Report

I’ve been meaning to do a detailed review of the National Surface Transportation Policy and Revenue Commission report (which was previously mentioned), but haven’t had time. Fortunately, the Antiplanner’s faithful ally, Ron Utt has reviewed the report, which you can read on the Heritage Foundation web site.

This is a hair buy viagra shop pharmacy store link loss product that was intended to boost the extended protection of your hair. It helps in getting a natural looking erection through several different models in which three-piece inflatable implant is the most effective. levitra viagra price Sildenafil citrate of super p force is PDE5 blocker chemical that assists in order to improve the blood flow to the viagra without prescription uk penis and allow one to have firm erection throughout the sexual incitement. Since many prostate cancers are very slow-growing, active surveillance may enable some men viagra sales on line to avoid the critical outcomes. In a nutshell, Utt says that the commission’s proposal to triple gasoline taxes is only one of several bad ideas in the report. Others include the report’s failure to acknowledge intercity bus service (which is practically unsubsidized yet must compete against heavily subsidized Amtrak) and further diversion from the highway trust fund. Utt also doesn’t like the proposed reorganization of the Department of Transportation.

I still will try to review the report in more detail soon. In the meantime, thanks to Ron, I can spend a little more time on my real job.

Bookmark the permalink.

About The Antiplanner

The Antiplanner is a forester and economist with more than fifty years of experience critiquing government land-use and transportation plans.

7 Responses to Review of Surface Transportation Commission Report

  1. Dan says:

    The founder of the Heritage Foundation was also disappointed in the final product, not for the reasons Randal implies here, but because BushCo appointees killed and removed portions of the report*. He also said:

    “I am a die-hard conservative Republican,” said Weyrich, “And it has become an absolute orthodoxy within the conservative movement that you cannot raise any taxes. Well, in this particular instance, I don’t see any alternative.”

    DS

    * http://www.renewamerica.us/columns/vernon/080121

  2. kens says:

    Robert Poole of the Reason Foundation also has a commentary on the report that’s well worth reading:

    http://www.reason.org/commentaries/poole_20080100.shtml

    His writing on transportation issues is always thoughtful and well-reasoned. I highly recommend his Surface Transportation Innovations newletter, which you can access or subscribe to on the Reason website.

  3. MJ says:

    The less said about intercity bus service, the better. It continues to beat the pants off of Amtrak, even without federal subsidy. Things can only get worse if the DOT finds a new target for doling out subsidy.

    Dan,

    Weyrich is the founder of the Free Congress Foundation, not Heritage. Also, if a ‘conservative’ is not conservative on transportation issues, is he really a conservative?

  4. Unowho says:

    “Weyrich is the founder of the Free Congress Foundation, not Heritage.

    Weyrich was also one of the founders of Heritage, as well as the Moral Majority. What a resume. He just hitched his wagon to Romney’s campaign. His position is not surprising; he’s a railfan, and has consistently supported Amtrak. He writes regularly at takimag.com, if you’re interested.

  5. MJ says:

    Thanks for the correction. I had no idea (…about the Moral Majority, either).

  6. the highwayman says:

    Paul Weyrich is an actual conservative, he’s just one of those few people that are honest about transportation policy.

    Amtrak has it’s flaws, though as a cost to taxpayers it’s less than two cents a day. Only having one Big Mac, a fry & a Coke at McDonald’s over the span of a year would set you back more than Amtrak.

  7. Pingback: Notes from All Over » The Antiplanner

Leave a Reply