Obama Nominates Streetcar Advocate for Secretary of Transportation

America’s transportation system will continue to grind to a halt under Obama’s pick for transportation secretary, Anthony Foxx. Currently mayor of Charlotte, NC, Foxx supports streetcars and other obsolete forms of transit.

It is a measure of the glacial pace of America’s political system that Obama had nearly sixteen months’ notice that current Secretary LaHood planned to step down at the end of Obama’s first term, yet the president required another full three months before finding a replacement. If the administration has anything to say about it, American travelers will move at the same glacial pace: the streetcars that Obama, LaHood, and Foxx want to fund are slower than most people can walk.

Transit advocates often point to Charlotte as an example of a successful low-capacity rail line. With success like this, I’d hate to see a failure: the line cost more than twice the original projection; generates just $3 million in annual fares against more than $20 million in annual operations and maintenance costs; and collects of an average of just 77 cents per ride compared with nearly a dollar for other light-rail lines. Now Charlotte wants to extend the line even though a traffic analysis report predicts that the extension will dramatically increase traffic congestion in the corridor (see pp. 54-56).

Foxx believes rail transit “drives economic development,” says George Washington University Professor Christopher Leinberger approvingly. “The goal of any transportation system, especially rail transit, is not to move people,” Leinberger says. “The goal is economic development at the stations.”
This drug bears the potential to accomplish the cholesterol reduction task throughitsbeneficial working pattern. cialis generic overnight Breast enhancer pills are created based on levitra vardenafil 20mg scientific methods, and have ingredients that boost the growth of breasts tissue. Power Khan with no doubt can recover cheapest viagra online weaken sexual ability withtremendous results if consumed correctly. Of AYUSH that acts as the regulatory and governing body for the entire administration and practice of traditional medicine systems in India including Ayurveda. cheap super viagra
Anthony Foxx certainly believes that. “If we didn’t do streetcar,” he asked the Charlotte city council during a debate, “does anybody have an idea how we’re going to revitalize” downtown Charlotte?

Rail advocates claim that Charlotte’s low-capacity-rail line helped revitalize neighborhoods along that line. However, a study by transportation expert David Hartgen concluded that most of the billions of dollars of development that was planned along the line was never built. Of the developments that were built, most would have taken place without the line, Hartgen found, though not necessarily in exactly the same locations.

The Antiplanner has said it before and I’ll say it again: transportation spending generates true economic growth only if it results in lower-cost, faster, and/or more convenient movement of people and goods. Streetcars and low-capacity rail are more expensive, slower, and for all but a tiny number of people less convenient than the alternatives, whether buses or cars. Even if you reduce transit rider costs by subsidizing them to the hilt, someone has to pay the subsidies and that slows economic growth.

Foxx is blissfully unaware of this and we can expect him to continue LaHood’s policy of giving away as much money as possible for transit projects that are as expensive as possible and move few people while creating more congestion for everyone else.

Bookmark the permalink.

About The Antiplanner

The Antiplanner is a forester and economist with more than fifty years of experience critiquing government land-use and transportation plans.

4 Responses to Obama Nominates Streetcar Advocate for Secretary of Transportation

  1. LazyReader says:

    Damn, I was just about to comment on that on the previous article.

  2. wintercow20 says:

    “Foxx believes rail transit “drives economic development,” says George Washington University Professor Christopher Leinberger approvingly. “The goal of any transportation system, especially rail transit, is not to move people,” Leinberger says. “The goal is economic development at the stations.”

    I loved that quote. Reminds me of perhaps my favorite Bastiat passage: http://www.econlib.org/library/Bastiat/basSoph4.html#S.1, Ch.17, A Negative Railroad

  3. MJ says:

    Is it too much to ask that just once we could have a transportation secretary who has some knowledge of the field, rather than another big-city mayor or former congressman?

  4. MJ says:

    “The goal of any transportation system, especially rail transit, is not to move people,” Leinberger says. “The goal is economic development at the stations.”

    Leinberger is too dumb to realize this, but his statement is actually an argument in favor of privately funded transit. If developers want to use transit projects as real estate development schemes, then they should be the ones providing the infrastructure. Then they can reap the huge rewards from all the “economic development” that materializes (or fails to).

Leave a Reply