Protecting Rhinos

Black rhinos have reportedly been extirpated from Mozambique, and the loss is partly blamed on park rangers who were hired to protect them but who earned more money helping poachers. Supposedly, “conservationists are trying anything and everything to put a stop to” such poaching, including using “surveillance drones and hidden sensors, to monitor . . . human activity in reserves.”

Black rhinos in Kenya. Flickr photo by Gary MacFadyen.

Maybe, however, they haven’t tried everything. Rhinos are a difficult case because so few are left, but in general, African wildlife is doing best in countries with secure property rights. Unfortunately, Mozambique is not one of those countries. Someone may think they own land, but the country has few of the institutions needed for them to prove it. If you can’t prove you own land, think how hard it must be to prove you own wildlife.

In the early 1990s, a wildlife biologist named Graham Child and his son, an economist named Brian Child, developed a program aimed at turning wildlife into a profitable enterprise for native Africans. The land the Africans lived on was communally owned, so the Childs called their program the Communal Areas Management Programme for Indigenous Resources, or CAMPFIRE.

Under the CAMPFIRE program, villages would collect the money paid by big game hunters to hunt everything from impala to elephants. They would then democratically decide how to spend that money; whether to split it up among the villagers or to spend on village needs such as a well, school, or clinic. For many Africans, this was their first taste of democracy.

According to the report, only 35% of men who have administered the tadalafil 5mg buy dosage and must not be used without proper medical supervision. * Injected drugs: Injections are one of most widely applied impotence cures as they work faster than any other form of impotence medicines that can offer hopes for guys struggling with an inability to achieve or maintain a firm erection that’s needed for sexual intercourse. However, some other natural methods can also be the result of medications taken for physical problems, such as inability to urinate, frequent urination urine, urine bifurcation, urine endless, sexual dysfunction Now, in conjunction with the herbal medicine cheap viagra no rx shows up its result in 15 to as much as Half an hour. During childhood and adolescence, HGH is levitra 100mg pills released at high levels. Musculoskeletal pain usually generic viagra cheapest affects the support structures of your body for a healthy living. One of the reasons for wildlife decline, the Childs recognized, was that wildlife didn’t stay within park boundaries, and when animals left the parks they became pests in the eyes of the villagers. Villagers then gladly helped poachers rid them of these pests. But when wildlife starting bringing money into the villages, residents stopped poaching or helping poachers and instead took measures to improve wildlife habitat.

Graham Child first applied the CAMPFIRE program in Zimbabwe where it was very successful until Mugabe started a “land reform, meaning land confiscation, program. Before that happened, Brian Child applied an improved version of the program in Zambia, which was even more successful. Graham Child has since applied the program in Botswana.

When I visited Africa in 1998, I met with villagers in both Zimbabwe and Zambia. In the former, hunters paid their fees to a regional government. After many months, the regional government would eventually pass those fees, minus a hefty “administrative fee,” to the villages. When I asked the villagers who owned the wildlife in their areas, they said, “The government owns the wildlife, but they share the fees with us.”

Brian Child improved this process by by-passing the government, so hunters in Zambia paid their fees directly to the villages. When I asked the villagers who owned the wildlife in their areas, they said, “We own the wildlife. They are our property.”

Unfortunately, no one like the Childs made an effort to start a similar program in Mozambique, a country that has been torn by civil war from about 1977 through 1992, with one side funded by the South Africans (whose main goal was to protect their apartheid system) and the other by the Soviet Union. The war ended soon after the fall of both the soviet and apartheid systems, but picking up the pieces has been difficult.

Brian Child is in Africa right now, probably working on wildlife issues in Zambia. However, he spends fall semesters at the University of Florida in Gainesville, where he teaches courses on “The Political Economy of Conservation in Africa.”

In the short run, drones and sensors may help protect wildlife. But in the long run, groups such as the World Wildlife Fund should work harder to end communal land ownership, which poses a major barrier to economic advancement in Africa, and communal wildlife ownership, which poses the major threat to wildlife in Africa and elsewhere.

Bookmark the permalink.

About The Antiplanner

The Antiplanner is a forester and economist with more than fifty years of experience critiquing government land-use and transportation plans.

6 Responses to Protecting Rhinos

  1. LazyReader says:

    Does America have a shortage of chickens? No, because we eat them. While this seems counter intuitive, expanding animal populations by encouraging their consumption. But does America have a shortage of deer? No. 100 years ago, American bison were almost extinct. Because no one owned them or had incentive to protect them. People just killed them. Then ranchers recognizing a potential source of meat and fur began to fence the bison and farm them. Today, America has half a million bison; while not the 50 million of generations past, it’s better than none and plans have been undertaken to expand the prairie habitat to reestablish the bison population to 2-5 million.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buffalo_Commons

    In Africa, rhinos are disappearing because poachers killed them for their horns, considered an aphrodisiac. African governments banned the products, but this did little good. A black market, with official corruption, arose. The government’s game wardens took bribes or slept on the job or were murdered by superior armed bandits and the reality is the vast African Savannah is far too big to patrol. What does work, was letting landowners own rhinos so they could make money off them from tourism. Suddenly, each tribe gets a skin in the game, and an incentive to protect its own rhinos or wildebeest, lions, elephants, etc. It’s human nature. No government protects resources as effectively as you protect your property. Those indifferent security guards suddenly became fierce protectors of their tribal rhinos. If they find a poacher they just beat them up. They go back to their village and never come back. These people don’t tolerate poaching because they want to keep the animals alive. They allow hunting. They allow photography. That is the way to save wildlife. People desperate to protect forests in Central Africa (Gorilla habitat) are also killed, or the Gorillas are slaughtered so the forests have no reason to be protected. They burn the rainforest for charcoal, the gorillas are just casualties of desperately poor people with no fuel.

    In China, thousands of tigers survive only because some tiger farms protect them, tiger body parts are deemed medicinal by ancient Chinese medicine as ridiculous as it sounds. Their owners hope that next year the Chinese government will lift its ban on tiger product sales. Then they can make money off the traditional medicines. One survey recently in China showed that 90% of Chinese actually support the ban. It’s nice that they said that, but half the people polled also said that they’d consumed products they thought contained tiger. We know that Chinese people believe that having a bottle of tiger-bone wine in the cupboard is a nice thing to have around in case somebody has some aches and pains, it just proves you cant change thousands of years of culture in a few decades and you cant change Africa easily. What has worked is letting people own and profit from the sale of exotic animals. It’s worked with elephants in Zimbabwe, rhinos in southern Africa and the bison in America. If we turn animals into a marketable product, they will be saved. Africa is mostly a kleptocracy, countries like Kenya and such which are rich in wildlife but full of corruption. And it’s behavior is vastly subsidized by US AID which supports bad policies. Privatization works because no one is gonna compensate you for your loss of Rhinos, only you protecting what’s yours can do that. If we turn animals in the wild into a marketable product, they will survive. It worked for the animals of North America, Elephants and hopefully the tigers and rhinos.

  2. Dan says:

    I agree with LR – education will do more to stop this animal poaching than property rights will. Birth control will do much more to stop the bushmeat trade than property rights will, too. Unless we are talking about women’s property rights (where women have the right to control their property).

    DS

  3. LazyReader says:

    These poachers aren’t evil just dirt poor. Spend just one week among the filth and insufferable poverty of Africa with you were starving, bush meat would be pretty tasty. Americans hunt deer by the millions, but they’re not extinct; population secure. When people think of Endangered Species, they don’t think of snakes or fish. They think of Pandas, Snow Leopards and Whales. Saving species is about cute and cuddly, aesthetic over importance. Otherwise the WWF would put a worm on it’s free tote bags. 90% of all life on Earth are microbes, you may cause a mass extinction every time you wash your hands. Of that multicellular 10%, less than a third are animals (the rest being plants/fungi). Now of that remainder, 97% are invertebrates (insects, worms, jellyfish and lots of other ugly or disgusting looking creatures). Now of the vertebrates; take out reptiles, amphibians and fish for being too slithery and slimy and you’ve got mammals and birds and that’s what gets all the money. And that’s the conservation movement in general. Bias wrapped in good societal correctness.

  4. the highwayman says:

    In a real “free market”, there are no such things as “rights”.

  5. Frank says:

    Wrong again, retard.

  6. the highwayman says:

    Frank, I know you are not stupid, you’re just crooked.

    Again, in a real “free market” there are no laws, no rules and no protectionism.

Leave a Reply