Transit’s Ticking Time Bomb

America’s largest transit agencies have obligated taxpayers to cover billions of dollars in pension and health care costs over the next thirty years. To see just how serious this problem is, the Antiplanner examined the consolidated financial statements for about two dozen of the nation’s largest transit agencies. The results vary widely from agency to agency: some have almost no unfunded obligations, while others appear headed for default or other serious financial problems.

The numbers in the table below are based on the latest financial statements I could obtain for each agency. Mostly this means 2013, but in a few cases they are one or two years older. Most agencies have growing unfunded obligations, so more recent updates are probably worse than shown. Agencies in some large cities, including Baltimore, Detroit, Minneapolis-St. Paul, San Francisco, and Seattle, are operated by other units of government whose financial statements don’t distinguish between unfunded transit obligations and other unfunded obligations. So if your large urban area isn’t on the above list, that’s probably why.

Unfunded Pension and Health Care Obligations<_center>

AgencyUrban AreaUnfunded ObligationsUnfunded as % of 2012 Op ExpenseUnfunded/Trip
MARTAAtlanta16439.8%1.21
Capital MetroAustin2816.8%0.78
MBTABoston2,764213.3%6.88
NiagaraBuffalo250200.2%8.14
CTAChicago1,21995.0%2.23
DARTDallas9020.0%1.28
RTDDenver23656.7%2.40
MetroHouston10626.1%1.31
LAMTALos Angeles1,350108.4%2.90
Miami-DadeMiami36379.4%3.38
NJ TransitNew Jersey1,10358.3%4.13
LIRRNew York1,264108.6%13.03
MaBSTOANew York938178.5%7.76
MTANew York19,942298.3%5.90
Metro NorthNew York00.0%0.00
AC TransitSF-Oakland343103.8%6.30
Orange CountyLos Angeles52.2%0.10
SEPTAPhiladelphia60251.8%1.66
Allegheny PAPittburgh1,044280.2%15.86
TriMetPortland1,126302.9%10.91
SacramentoSacramento142112.4%5.39
UTASalt Lake City10451.4%2.45
VIASan Antonio15190.1%2.97
San DiegoSan Diego223104.7%2.61
BARTSF-Oakland43087.9%3.62
VTASan Jose29095.9%6.67
Bi-StateSt. Louis278125.0%5.94
PSTASt. Petersburg35.8%0.24
WMATAWashington2,523166.8%5.95

The financial statement for New York’s Metropolitan Transportation Authority separately lists the unfunded obligations of four different agencies: Long Island Railroad, Metro-North, MTA, and the Manhattan and Bronx Surface Transportation Operating Authority. It is striking that Metro-North has no unfunded obligations, while MTA, which runs the subways and most city buses, has a staggering obligation of nearly $20 billion, which is more than all the other agencies in the table combined.

In the same way, the Chicago Transit Authority has $1.2 billion in unfunded obligations, but as near as I can tell, Metra, Chicago’s suburban commuter train operator, has no unfunded obligations. It is possible that some suburban commuter agencies are immune from the problem because they are controlled by federal railroad retirement rules; if so, that only shows that other agencies could choose to fully fund their future obligations as well.
Apart from our habit to stay connected with our loved ones all the time, having a reliable power supply becomes levitra 10mg necessary. Kamagra Jelly is not an aphrodisiac and stimulation will be required to develop an erection. generic tadalafil cipla you could try here These days, many males suffer from erectile dysfunction, which is also found in the cialis order levitra deeprootsmag.org original medication. Resveratrol does many things for the body including penile. deeprootsmag.org cheap tadalafil overnight
One measure of the severity of problem is the ratio of unfunded obligations to the annual operating expenses for each agency. By this measure, Portland’s TriMet is number one, with obligations that are more than three times its 2012 expenses. New York’s MTA is a close second, while the average of the agencies shown here is 160 percent of the annual operating budget.

Another measure is the unfunded obligation per trip carried. At nearly $11, TriMet was beaten in this category by the Long Island Railroad and Port Authority of Allegheny County (Pittsburgh). I’m no expert, but I’d say that any agency with unfunded obligations of more than 20 percent of its operating budget or more than $1 per trip is in serious trouble.

Most of the agencies I looked at operated rail lines as well as buses. Two bus agencies, Orange County Transit and Pinellas Suncoast Transit, have minimal unfunded obligations, but a third, AC Transit, has huge obligations. I’ll have to look at more bus agencies to see if AC Transit is an anomaly, which would suggest that bus agencies are mostly immune from the unfunded liability problem, possibly because rail costs are so high that they tempt agencies to defer funding of their pension and health care obligations.

The agencies shown in the table carried 72 percent of transit trips in 2012 and have unfunded obligations totaling $37 billion. If the remaining transit agencies have obligations average $5 per trip, the total of unfunded obligations is more than $51 billion. I suspect smaller transit agencies have much smaller liabilities, but since many large agencies are not in the table, the total is probably pretty close to $50 billion.

It would be easy to dismiss this problem by saying that future growth in tax revenues will take care of it. That could be true with agencies like Pinellas Suncoast (PSTA) and Orange County Transit that have kept unfunded obligations low, but it is certainly not true of agencies like TriMet and MTA that have left their pension and health care plans unfunded while they build expensive new rail transit lines. In the next couple of decades, these agencies will have to choose between massive tax increases, severe service cuts, or defaulting on their pension and health care plans.

Tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

About The Antiplanner

The Antiplanner is a forester and economist with more than fifty years of experience critiquing government land-use and transportation plans.

9 Responses to Transit’s Ticking Time Bomb

  1. Sandy Teal says:

    The best 30 minute lesson on light rail ever is showing on FXX cable network tonight, Friday, at 9:00 pm ET.
    “Marge vs. the Monorail” : One of Conan O’Brien’s most famous works.

    Best transit song ever too. http://youtu.be/sZBPoRwog00

  2. JOHN1000 says:

    “…choose between massive tax increases, severe service cuts, or defaulting on their pension and health care plans.” One other choice exists – the one they will definitely choose: to ignore and defer maintenance/safety needs–much more than they do already.

    The result will be more trains closed down or off schedule, creating major problems for the consumers of the services. Also, there will be derailments and/or crashes and loss of life. These crises will be used to force tax increases and bailouts to protect those who have abused the system so badly.

  3. Fred_Z says:

    The average Joe may prefer to see default. The pay of the heavily unionized transit workforces is obscenely high, and so are their pensions.

    My own employees, laborers and tradesmen, are both envious and contemptuous of all civic employees doing what they do for vastly more than I can pay.

  4. gilfoil says:

    I’m not worried. The Antiplanner’s proposal to buy cars for poor people is a bargain at only $9000 per person. 46 million poor people (http://poverty.ucdavis.edu/faq/how-many-people-are-poor), let’s say buy cars for half of them (the other half are too young or old to drive), and that’s only 23 million * $9000 = $200 billion dollars a year. A bargain compared to the unsustainable light rail fantasy.

  5. Builder says:

    gilfoil,

    First, you are either very ignorant or you know that no one is proposing that we buy a car for every poor person in the US.. The antiplanner is simply showing that mass transit has become so expensive in the United States it would be cheaper to buy every user a car rather than build mass transit systems to are supposed to serve them.

    Second, you are referencing the average yearly cost of owning a car. This average includes many people who buy a new luxury car every few years. If, like me, you drive a 1998 Mercury Tracer you bought used for $3000 the yearly cost will be much less.

  6. Frank says:

    Gilfoil is a DB. He doesn’t care about facts or statistics or anecdotes like how our second car, a 1999 model full paid for, has been driven only 1000 miles in a year and is cheaper—and more convenient—than transit.

    Gilfoil is just here to troll and demolish strawmen.

    Undoubtedly, with Dan’s disappearance as a sign, Gilfoil is Dan’s sock or meat puppet.

  7. lbh says:

    How is this a transit problem? It’s a poor governance problem. For the biggest agency you can place the blame on the likes of Cuomo (D) and Pataki (R) for giving overly generous contracts in election years. They haven’t kept other funds in good shape either. Get as much as you can now, push as much of the cost into the future for the next generation to worry about paying for. No surprise that De Blasio has done similarly at the city level since taking office.

  8. MJ says:

    I’m not worried. The Antiplanner’s proposal to buy cars for poor people is a bargain at only $9000 per person. 46 million poor people (http://poverty.ucdavis.edu/faq/how-many-people-are-poor), let’s say buy cars for half of them (the other half are too young or old to drive), and that’s only 23 million * $9000 = $200 billion dollars a year. A bargain compared to the unsustainable light rail fantasy.

    Are you proposing to buy them a new car every year?

Leave a Reply