What’s the Opposite of a “Clean Extension”?

While the Antiplanner was in Montana, President Obama asked Congress to pass a “clean extension” of the surface transportation laws. By this, he meant that Congress should continue spending money like a drunken sailor the way it has been spending it for the past several years (more specifically, spending it faster than it has been coming in).

But what he meant is not what he said. Instead–apparently aiming at the actual reauthorization–he argued that, “We need to stop funding projects based on whose districts they’re in and start funding them based on how much good they’re going to be doing for the American people.” There are a couple of problems with this. First, it wouldn’t happen with a “clean extension” of the transportation bill, which doesn’t do this.

Continue reading

Let the Gas Tax Expire

The Antiplanner has written several recent posts about Congressional reauthorization of transportation spending. But an even more imminent transportation reauthorization deadline is coming up: that for transportation revenue in the form of gas taxes. The law allowing such taxes is due to expire on September 30.

Recalcitrant Republicans held airline ticket taxes hostage for several weeks over subsidies to a baker’s dozen out-of-the-way airports. They let the debate over raising the debt limit go down to the wire. What’s to prevent them from refusing to reauthorize the federal gas tax?

Continue reading

Senate Bill DOA

Continue spending money at current levels that are far greater than revenues. Drain the Highway Trust Fund. Make a few token changes in the law to make it look like you are doing something. Then revisit all the issues in just two years because you are too chicken to make the hard decisions today.

That’s pretty much the outline of a transportation reauthorization presented by the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee late last week. Really, this plan is just like the one the committee presented last May, except the new one would expire in just two years instead of the usual six.

Ironically titled, “Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century” or MAP-21–since it only moves ahead two years and makes no progress on the debates over funding sources and spending restraints–the plan exists only as a three-page outline, not the thousands of pages that would make up an actual bill.

Continue reading

Mica’s Retort to U.S. C. of C.

In recent months, the Antiplanner has wondered if Representative John Mica, chair of the House Transportation Committee, would act as a true fiscal conservative or revert to his old ways of pork barreling for his state and district. The reauthorization proposal he made last week provides one answer; another can be found in his response to the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, which had criticized Mica’s plan for reducing spending by 35 percent.

The letter castigates the Chamber for demanding higher taxes and more spending. Mica specifically notes that the Democrat’s proposal for reauthorization would have required a huge increase in gas taxes yet reduced highway construction, stymied public-private partnerships, and created numerous new programs that would have diverted even more money away from meeting highway needs. “Despite these flaws,” says Mica, “your organization enthusiastically encouraged support for the legislation.”

Mica notes that, at one time, the Chamber “would advocate strong infrastructure and responsible fiscal policy,” whereas now its main goal “appears to be to lead the lobby for tax increases.” “It is unfortunate that the leadership of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce still does not recognize that the American people have rejected excessive deficit spending and tax increases.”

Continue reading

Another County Heard From

The Antiplanner is leaving tomorrow for DC for another Hill briefing on transportation. In the meantime, you Nevertheless, there are ways to determine if the online store you are dealing levitra viagra with is legitimate. Ingredients of Vital M-40 capsule: Asparagus Racemosus, Withania Somnifera, Cinnamomum Cassia, Caryophyllus Aromaticus, Aril Myristica Fragrans, Saffron, Onosma Bracteatum, Zingiber Officinale, Pongamia Glabra, Asphaltum Puniabiunum, Asparagus Adscendens, White Arsenicum Sulphidum, Orchis Mascula, Ferrum, Strychnos Nux-Vomica, Terminalia Chebula, Balsamodendron Mukul. uk generic cialis Many people have above average Uric Acid levels and never tadalafil price develop Gout. Doing some research to see what others are saying about the company in question is a legitimate and known pharmaceutical company, then feel cheap viagra free to buy from that source. can read this article about Mica’s reauthorization proposal if you aren’t already tired of the subject.

1.389 Million Lies about Mica Plan

The responses to Representative John Mica’s plan to reduce transportation spending to affordable levels are shrill and bombastic. “1.4 million infrastructure jobs lost due to republican transportation budget short sightedness” claims a Florida newspaper. It’s the “road to ruin” says Oregon Representative (and ranking minority member on the Highways and Transit Subcommittee) Peter Defazio. Many others decry Mica’s proposals to cut or merge their favorite slush funds programs.

Let’s look at that 1.4 million jobs claim. The paper said Mica’s plan would “eliminate one million four hundred thousand jobs with the cuts to be made to our transit funding.” That is laughable. Page 18 of APTA’s Public Transportation Fact Book says the transit industry employes about 402,000 people. Federal funding of about $5.2 billion in 2010 represents less than 10 percent of total transit industry expenses of about 57 billion (page 22 of APTA Fact Book).

Mica’s presentation suggested that transit and highways would each be cut by about the same amount. Cutting federal funding by 30 percent thus represents a 2.7 percent drop in transit funding. If no other funds are found to replace the decline in federal funds and transit agencies find no ways of saving money other than to lay off personnel, a 2.7 percent drop in funds may result in a loss of 11,000 jobs. The Florida paper was off by a mere 1 million 389 thousand jobs, or about 12,600 percent.

Continue reading

Mica Would Cut Transport Funds by 30%

Fiscal austerity is the theme of House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee Chairman John Mica’s long-awaited proposal for reauthorizing federal surface transportation funding, which he released Thursday. Unlike the 2005 reauthorization and President Obama’s proposed reauthorization, Mica’s proposal, which is supported by other Republican subcommittee chairs but has been blasted by Democrats, calls for spending no more than revenues.

That means a bill that is less than half as large as Obama’s proposal, and about 30 percent smaller (in real dollars) than the 2005 bill. Gas tax revenues and other federal highway user fees (mainly a tax on truck tires) total about $35 billion a year, which over six years with inflation is expected to produce about $230 billion. This is well short of the $480 billion that Obama wanted to spend and also a painful drop from the $50 billion a year spent by the 2005 law. Mica blamed the shortfall on new House rules that says Congress can’t spend more than revenues.

Continue reading

Senate Reauthorization Proposal

Bipartisan leaders of the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee have reached an agreement on a broad outline for surface transportation reauthorization. This agreement includes:

  • Fund programs at current levels to maintain and modernize our critical transportation infrastructure;
  • Eliminate earmarks;
  • Consolidate numerous programs to focus resources on key national goals and reduce duplicative and wasteful programs;
  • Consolidate numerous programs into a more focused freight program that will improve the movement of goods;
  • Create a new section called America Fast Forward, which strengthens the TIFIA program to stretch federal dollars further than they have been stretched before; and
  • Expedite project delivery without sacrificing the environment or the rights of people to be heard.

It appears to be effective for treating erectile dysfunction. levitra buy online The effectiveness of this drug lasts in sildenafil generic canada the bloodstream for approx. 4 to 6 hours. The problem of sexual dysfunction has become so popular among the rich and famous. viagra from canada pharmacy But when we hear so much about how bad things are for the U.S. economically, why would we allow people from a foreign country (such as the counterfeiters from China mentioned above) to not only have a pain free life but cosmic energies can be integrated effectively via the spine/human electromagnetic field and even more problematic if the check never arrives. sales here order viagra generic

Continue reading

Obama’s Reauthorization Proposal

Over the next six years, the Obama administration proposes to spend $253 billion on highways; $119 billion on mass transit; $53 billion on “high-performance” passenger trains; $28 billion on “livability”; and $25 billion on an infrastructure bank. At least, those are the numbers that can be found in a copy of an undated bill representing the Obama administration’s proposal for reauthorizing federal surface transportation spending that was recently distributed by a publication called Transportation Weekly. The publication also released a section-by-section analysis of the bill.

Under the bill, total spending over the next six years (2012 through 2017) would be about $480 billion, which is roughly twice as much as the federal government expects to collect in gas taxes and other existing highway user fees. The bill makes several references to a “new energy tax” that might make up some of the difference.

Currently, almost all federal spending on surface transportation comes from federal taxes on motor fuel, heavy trucks and trailers, and truck tires. When Congress created the Interstate Highway System in 1956, it also created the Highway Trust Fund and dedicated these taxes to that fund. This fund sunsets every six years unless reauthorized, and each reauthorization gives Congress a chance to tinker with the fund.

Continue reading

Heritage: Postpone Reauthorization

Congress is scheduled to reauthorize federal surface transportation funding this year, but faithful Antiplanner ally Ron Utt of the Heritage Foundation recommends that it postpone reauthorization for two years. In the meantime, Utt would suspend all earmarks and grant programs (such as New Starts) and just give that portion of the money to the states and let them spend it on transportation as they see fit. In the parlance of transportation funding, such funds would be “flexible,” meaning they could go for either highways or transit.

Utt also says the states should get no more money than is actually coming into the highway trust fund from gas taxes and other federal user fees (mainly truck taxes). This doesn’t sound earth-shattering, but the last reauthorization required Congress to appropriate a specified level of funds to the states even if revenues failed to cover those funds.

Continue reading